LAWMAKERS DEBATE BIPARTISAN AIRPORT GATE ACCESS PROPOSAL
December 22, 2025
Eckert Seamans has prepared the information in this update for educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice nor substitute for legal advice. Neither your receipt of information from this website nor your use of this website to contact Eckert Seamans or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship, as the firm may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter. Accordingly, you should not provide confidential information to Eckert Seamans. Persons seeking legal advice should consult a licensed professional attorney in their state. The firm’s Terms of Use, Legal Notice, and Disclaimer detailed herein are expressly incorporated into the Aviation Regulatory Update.
The U.S. Senate’s Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights recently held a hearing on airline competition issues, including a bipartisan proposal to require all U.S. airports using federal grants to finance terminal construction projects to guarantee “reasonable access” to gates. The legislative proposal intends to prevent major U.S. air carriers from crowding out new entrant carriers seeking access to airport gates. Low-cost carriers, including Allegiant and Frontier, support the so-called Airport Gate Competition Act to thwart major U.S. air carriers from creating “fortress hubs” dominated by one carrier at the expense of low-cost competitors. Since four major carriers hold about 80 percent of the domestic market, airline competition advocates view airport gate access as a tool to increase competition, especially in emerging U.S. markets. If enacted into law, the legislation could prevent major U.S. air carriers from “gatekeeping” underused gates by implementing “use it or lose it” rules at most U.S. airports. The Act could also benefit foreign air carriers because it would require at least 25 percent of airport gates be available for “common use” and that no more than 50 percent of airport gates be reserved for a single carrier.
Eckert Seamans’ Aviation Blog is intended to keep readers current on developments in the law. It is not intended to be legal advice. If you have any questions, please contact Evelyn Sahr at 202.659.6622 or esahr@eckertseamans.com; Drew Derco at 202.659.6665 or dderco@eckertseamans.com; Jay Julien at 202.659.6648 or jjulien@eckertseamans.com; Tyler Myers at 202.659.6642 or trmyers@eckertseamans.com, or any other attorney at Eckert Seamans with whom you have been working.